The statement must have been addressed to the claimant

While the defendant’s misrepresentation may have induced the claimant to enter into a contract, the claimant will only have a claim if the misrepresentation was addressed to her.

Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377

A statement in a prospectus was intended to invite persons to take allotments of shares in the company. Once the shares to which the statement related had been issued, the statement was exhausted. A subsequent purchaser of those shares in the market had no right of action as regards the falseness of statements in the prospectus.

You cannot copy content of this page